COVID-19 Notice:
Our law firm remains fully operational and ready to help you with all your legal needs. Click here to learn more.


Pure or Impure: Real Estate Tax Exemption in Pennsylvania for Purely Public Charities

By: Pamela A. Lee, Esquire
In Pennsylvania, our law provides for the “principle that a taxpayer should pay no more or no less than his proportionate share of the cost of government.” Our Supreme Court has explained that taxes are not penalties but are contributions which all are expected to make to fund the cost of government.

However, certain organizations in Pennsylvania-such as so-called “purely public charities” -may be exempt from real estate tax based upon the traditional premise that they are given a “quid pro quo” for providing services which the government would otherwise have to provide.

Because taxation is the rule, the organization seeking real estate tax exemption has the affirmative burden to prove it is entitled to exemption. In Pennsylvania, an entity purporting to be an institution of purely public charity must establish entitlement under (a) the common law construing the PA Constitution; (2) the Purely Public Charities Act (“Act 55”); and (3) the Consolidated County Assessment Law (the “CCAL”).

First, an entity must satisfy all five prongs under the Constitution as delineated under Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 487 A.2d 1306 (Pa. 1995), commonly referred to as “the HUP test.” Under the HUP test, an entity must meet all of the following requirements:
  • Advances a charitable purpose;
  • Donates or renders gratuitously a substantial portion of its services;
  • Benefits a substantial and indefinite class of persons who are legitimate subjects of charity;
  • Relieves the government of some of its burden; and
  • Operates entirely free from private profit motive.
Failure to satisfy any one of these elements disqualifies an entity from classification as an institute of purely public charity.

Next, an entity must establish that it is an institution of purely public charity under the standards set by Act 55. Act 55’s five requirements track those of the HUP test and provide quantitative elements determining whether an entity qualifies as an institution of purely public charity.

Finally, a property owner claiming real estate tax exemption bears the burden of proving that the subject property is “actually and regularly used for purposes of the institution” or is used to “advance the charitable purposed of the institution under the CCAL. The CCAL does not allow an exemption unless the entity using and occupying the property is seized of the legal or equitable title in the property. Thus, exemption will not be given if the property is owned by one entity and occupied by another entity.

Why the high burden for purported charitable organizations? Because taxpayers unjustly pay more than their fair share of the cost of government when other property owners “game” the system and pay less than their fair share in real estate taxes.  The law is such that it protects all our taxpayers, not only those purporting to be purely public charities.

The attorneys at the Law Firm of DiOrio and Sereni, LLP are experienced and available to help you. Contact Pamela A. Lee, Esquire at (610) 565-5700, or send her an email at [email protected].

Like what you see? Join our mailing list

Like what you see? Share it, or join our mailing list

The National Trial Lawyers

The Law Firm of DiOrio & Sereni, LLP, is located in Media, PA and serves clients in and around Media, Glen Riddle Lima, Brookhaven, Wallingford, Newtown Square, Lenni, Springfield, Swarthmore, Chester, Aston, Bryn Mawr, Morton, Woodlyn, Broomall, Gradyville, Folsom, Chester Heights, Crum Lynne, Glen Mills, Marcus Hook, Ridley Park, Drexel Hill, Marple, Bethel, Garnet Valley, Chadds Ford Concord, Chester County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Philadelphia County.


Design by GetLegal.com and Bret Black

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
Site Map | Disclaimer